Skip to Content

Technical validation of compliance evidence 

Automated assessment of compliance evidence to determine whether they truly substantiate the fulfillment of each obligation and provide a defensible technical-legal opinion, ready for audit.


 Evaluate my evidence of compliance  See how Alma operates 

 

+100%

Standardized criterion 

+90%

Reduction of times

 100% 

traceability

+90%

cost reduction




How we do it 

We evaluate evidence against each obligation. We cross evidence <--> obligation and determine meets / partially meets / does not meet.

We detect gaps and deviations
We identify missing items, inconsistencies, and deviations from the validation criterion. 

We prioritize by criticality and risk
 We assign priority by obligation to focus action where it matters most.

We verified coverage and consistency. 
We reviewed dates, frequencies, environmental components, and required content.




How we do it 

Mandatory report (PDF)
Result meets / partial / does not meet, with technical justification and detected gaps. 

Gap and priority matrix (Excel)
Consolidated list of gaps, reviewed evidence, and applied criterion, ready for audit and oversight.

Traceability and support
Clear link between obligation, reviewed evidence, and applied criterion, ready for audit and oversight.

 

Need help?

In this section, you can find answers to some of the most frequently asked questions.


What type of evidence can we evaluate?

We can evaluate typical compliance evidence such as reports, certificates, minutes, records, spreadsheets, monitoring reports, and supporting documents (according to the format we define). The analysis aims to confirm whether the evidence supports compliance: environmental component, content, required dates, and frequency.

How do we determine "complies / does not comply / partially complies" and how defensible is the ruling?

We issue a report with technical justification and traceability regarding the evaluated obligation. Review the alignment between the obligation and the evidence (what is requested vs. what the document proves), identify gaps (missing items) and deviations (discrepancies in components, dates, frequency, or content). The result is ready for internal review and audit, as it explains the "why" of the report, not just the outcome.

Does it replace the criteria of the legal/technical team or can the criteria be adjusted?

It does not replace your team: it executes repeatable work with consistent criteria. For enterprise clients, we can adjust the evaluation criteria (for example, what is considered sufficient evidence, thresholds, rules by type of obligation, justification format, risk/priority levels) to align it with your internal standard and your method of oversight/audit.

What happens if the evidence is incomplete or does not meet the expected format?

We detect it and make it explicit. When the evidence is not sufficient to verify compliance, Anna marks it as non-compliant or partial, identifies what is missing (document, data, signature, date, component, period, etc.), and suggests the type of support needed to close the gap. This way, you don't waste time on endless reviews and can request exactly what is missing.


How is the confidentiality of the evidence I upload handled?

Evidence is treated as sensitive compliance information. You can work with role-based access controls and maintain traceability of the process (what was evaluated and when). For enterprise clients, we can define additional requirements (for example: retention rules, separate environments, internal policies, and backup formats) to align the use of Anna with your security and audit standards.

Ready to secure your compliance evidence? 

Tell us your case and we will respond in less than 12 hours.

Review my evidence