EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE EVALUATED
WITH EXPERT CRITERION
We contrast each piece of evidence with the obligation that must be demonstrated to determine compliance, identify gaps, and deliver a traceable and defensible result.
Tell us your case See how ALMA operates
HOW WE DO IT
We contrast each evidence with its obligation
We evaluate whether the support effectively meets the requirements and determine its compliance status.
We detect gaps and deviations
We identify missing items, inconsistencies, and differences from what is required.
We verify coverage and consistency
We review content, dates, frequency, components, and other relevant conditions of the obligation.
We prioritize what requires action
We organize the gaps according to criticality and risk to focus management where it matters most.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Result by obligation
Compliance status —compliant, partial, or non-compliant— accompanied by the corresponding criterion and justification.
Matrix of gaps and priorities
Consolidation of detected gaps, reviewed evidence, and priorities for management.
Traceability and support
Link between obligation, evaluated evidence, and applied criterion, ready for review, audit, or oversight.
DETERMINED COMPLIANCE
You know what you fulfill and what you don't.
Meets · Partial · Does not meet
IDENTIFIED GAPS
You know exactly what's missing.
Missing · inconsistencies · deviations
PRIORITIZED RISK
You know where to act first.
Criticality · risk · priority
TRACEABLE BACKUP
You know why we arrive at each result.
Obligation · evidence · criterion
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What type of evidence can we evaluate?
We can evaluate reports, certificates, minutes, records, forms, monitoring reports, and other documents used to verify compliance with obligations.
The evaluation contrasts the content of the evidence with what is required by each obligation, considering aspects such as required background, dates, frequency, component, and applicable conditions.
How is it determined whether an obligation is fulfilled, partially fulfilled, or not fulfilled?
We contrast what the obligation requires with what the evidence actually verifies.
The result identifies agreements, missing items, and deviations, and makes explicit the criteria used to determine the compliance status. Thus, not only is a result obtained, but also the basis that allows it to be reviewed and defended.
Does ALMA replace the criteria of the technical or legal team?
.No. ALMA consistently executes the review and contrast work under previously defined criteria.
When the service requires it, the evaluation criteria can be adapted to the context, methodology, and standards of the organization, maintaining traceability over its application.
What happens when evidence is incomplete?
The result makes it explicit.
When the evidence does not allow for full verification of compliance, we identify what background is missing —document, data, signature, date, component, period, or other required element— and the gap that needs to be resolved.
This allows management to focus on what is truly missing to verify compliance.
How is the information contained in the evidence protected?
The information provided by the client is used to execute the contracted service and is managed under the applicable security and privacy measures in ALMA.
The client's information is not used to train general foundational models, whether proprietary or third-party, unless expressly authorized.
DO YOU NEED TO KNOW IF YOUR EVIDENCE REALLY CREDITS COMPLIANCE?
Tell us your case and we will define the scope, deliverables, and evaluation timelines.